Information about the world is a fixed change in the measuring system. We simply do not have any other information, except for the assessment of changes in the measuring system relative to itself. Even the passage of time we estimate by the change in spatial indicators. And despite our opinion, in fact, we ourselves, and our measuring instruments do not give any data, except for the representation of spatial changes in a particular measuring system. I called it – «presenting information through properties». And suddenly I found that the exception to the description of the introduced cognitive distortions leads the presentation of information of any level of aggregation to the same form – the form of “presentation of information through properties”. This fundamentally different approach to information is intuitively known to everyone, it seems that thanks to the «presentation of information through properties» we learn to walk, talk, see and learn. Correct understanding and correct form of information — fantasy makes fantasies, and reality accompanies the correct description.
Modern information systems, hardware, software and presentation of information inherited cognitive distortions of developers.
As a result, we are dealing with hardware dependent on constructive agreements, programming languages, inheriting a lack of understanding of the subject of automation, data presentation format that does not support heredity, heterogeneous uncoordinated task–dependent information arrays.
Explicit cognitive distortion refers to the existing object — oriented approach. However, to understand the nature of cognitive distortion in the object–oriented approach and what exactly is the mass distortion of understanding, it is necessary to understand the cause of the error and the mechanism of its spread.
During the period of physiological maturation and barbaric socialization, people accept lies along with an example of behavior from the object of imitation. And what is obvious to a small child is beyond the understanding of an adult.
Substitution of intelligent activity with cunning and enterprise as a parasitic model of behavior of people with insufficient knowledge for the modern level of technology leads not only to the cultivation of intellectually disabled people, but also to the loading of distorted content into the consciousness of an honest person seeking to know the real world.
Intelligent activity differs from reflex activity in that each decision is accompanied by a new Association. The basis of social parasitism is communication based on deception. The person seems to you not to be who he really is. A potential social parasite plays a role, just like in a theatrical performance. The parasite needs a victim of social deception who does not understand that she is being deceived. Social deception is always based on cognitive distortion, which the “victim” uses to create his or her own predicted cognitive distortions. This creates the soil for parasitism.
The most dangerous parasitic “bookmarks” are created at the lowest level of understanding. Of convictions obtained in the beginning of the path of knowledge to remove the hardest, they are included in the logical structure of beliefs and become inaccessible to modification of a part of conscious activity. Inconsistencies are created by forming emotional reactions and replacing the axiomatic content of elementary theorems that replace the meaning of the analyzed models to the conclusions obtained as a result of omitted elementary evidence. This violates the principles of formation of human knowledge and replaces reasonable behavior with an emotional reaction.
The parasite is brought up on synthetic social principles that do not work in the natural world, and the victim is vaccinated cognitive rupture of consciousness, limiting reasonable ability.
In the model of socialization (education/competencies) – people are in the process of confrontation with their own cognitive distortions and social parasitism.
Your enemies–parasitic on you — the living dead, which can only be defeated by defeating your last delusion. The only thing you can win is your own stupidity as long as you have the chance to remain an honest person. Or you irrevocably become a destructive character, whose life is adjusted by the stupidity of others and doomed, because the goal has no value for anyone, even for you. Life is a plot when victory is possible only over oneself. And there are no other subjects. Self–assertion – the last stage of the parasitic strategy of genetic material, unsuitable for the continuation of the human race reasonable. Obtaining new knowledge for a reasonable person is a constant process, so mathematical modeling of opposition to one’s own cognitive distortions and strategies of parasitism on the part of other members of society can be considered sufficient for decomposition and modeling of social processes.
The modern step in civilizational development is to comprehend and destroy the non–viable system built on unconscious lies, which instead of creating new artificial habitats of the species, destroys the existing natural habitat of the intelligent man.
Understanding household unknowingly creates a dangerous technology for life.


The definition of science in the Russian–speaking segment in the world system of collecting rumors is as follows: “Science — the area of human activity aimed at the development and systematization of objective knowledge about reality”.
It follows from the definition that “objective knowledge” allegedly exists. But in fact, all knowledge is of human origin. Everything has an author. And if your knowledge is obtained exclusively from your senses in the study of nature – it means no more than the fact that the source of this knowledge – you personally. It is not surprising that in the Russian–speaking segment, scientists are those who have been qualified by other scientists, with all the ensuing consequences.
In the English segment of the global encyclopedia of rumors read: “Science (from the Latin scientia, which means “knowledge”) — a systemic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of verifiable explanations and predictions about the Universe».
The presentation of knowledge in the form of verifiable explanations is a necessary but insufficient condition. Knowledge should not contain deliberate distortions. Only in this case they will be important for science.
The understanding of science by the Russian–speaking audience is significantly inferior in comparison with the English–speaking understanding.
Misunderstanding – satellite technological gap. However, in the understanding of the Russian–speaking audience, and in the English–speaking understanding, there are common misconceptions.
The science should include everything that does not contain deliberate distortions.
The post–economic period of economic activity has led us to the need to revise monetary — oriented instruments, including patent law and regulation in the field of scientific research.
A new understanding of science allows not only to contribute to each a single person, but also to implement the regulation of restrictions of access rights to resources not mastered by the person in the learning process.
Test explanations –a thankless task, and there is no responsible. The picture of masking misconceptions by methods of verification is illustrated by inadequate understanding and use of the term “Object”.
In our understanding, to be paid the understanding of the object as something real, although nothing about the physical nature and boundaries of the place of destination, called object is not a sign, in addition to our own conclusions.
In fact, we have only perception. We perceive in parts, and what we perceive is always also a part–an external manifestation. In our consciousness, there is always a fragmentary picture and the appearance in this picture of such a thing as an “object” is akin to a divine phenomenon. Associative perception gives us a picture of the world made up of “properties”, moreover, our classification, generalization and detailing also involve a verbal designation, but even if we call something” object”, it is just an additional synthetic generalized property.
It would seem that what is new here, what is the difference, Association, object or property. Sorry, everything makes sense:
Association – the derivative entity
Object – the subject of a hoax about the Truth
Property — – a tangible part of the Truth.
By receiving associations, we document the properties of material truth, which is inaccessible to us comprehensively, but available directly in external manifestations.
This is a comprehensive description of the current model of human information support. Perhaps the model is valid for any living organism.
The information description of reality de facto is reduced to the description of set of properties which semantic communication consists in the description of each property by the table of the indexes corresponding to the adequate description of an event of emergence.
The adequacy of the subject of perception provides its own authentication, orientation in space and time.
The information integrity of the property is determined by a unified logical connection with other properties, a binary component consisting of three parts in the model of information connectivity “what with what and what”.
If the General direct addressing is divided into groups, we get two almost symmetrical components:
Spatial position,
Parent property,
Child property
Binding property.

This is direct semantic addressing, which is used in the technology of information representation through properties.
The asymmetry of the representation is that in the group “ Logic “the order of placing pointers to” properties “in the” triples “of binary relations can be different, what is the meaning, whereas in the group” Adequacy “ a pointer to each the “property” is positioned in a pre–known sense and cannot be contained in another position.
Thus, we have formed a pair of spatial triumvirates of neural networks:
own authenticity
unified logical link
Small deviation.
Something came to remember hemisphere of the brain. And the distribution of hemispheric functional... Although for this article it does not matter, but perhaps — this is the topic of individual studies.
What gives us the replacement for understanding the logical chain “the fly sits on the table, the table in the room, a room in the city, the city in Russia” to “like a fly, like that sits, like a table, like the table in the room, like a room in the city, like the city in Russia”?
The answer is simple. When we stop lying, the lifetime of the information we distribute changes, because not only its content changes, but also its actual status in the first model, we were cunning and the lifetime was determined by the time of exposure, the information built on the second model will live forever, will always be relevant and may be needed.

Honest people defend their mistakes, whereas a liar will break before you Comedy. It’s easy to be honest ... or rather “honest fool”, but democracy is for honest people who possess modern knowledge in full.
Now, after analyzing the mechanisms of formation of human views, let’s move on to the technology of presenting information through properties.


The adequacy of semantic representation of data makes it possible to simplify the processes of information processing, to solve the issues of semantic compatibility of heterogeneous data, to personalize digital content at the time of its production, to distribute the responsibility of providing access to information between its owners, to ensure consistency, relevance, distributed processing of a single semantic understanding of multilingual information.
We have the opportunity to change our own approaches to data presentation, programming and return to the use of the language of meanings in communications.
We eliminate the need for knowledge of many languages for mutual understanding between people.

The introduction of technology for presenting information through properties affects the following areas:
Creation of advanced databases, organization of storage systems and communication environments providing access.
Design and creation of advanced computing facilities.
Design and creation of advanced software.
Revision of approaches to the organization of communication means:
Changing the subject of interest and business development of telecommunications companies.
Creation of a unified information base to support social development.
The transition of computing from hardware system agreements on the information system agreement.
Revision of the object–oriented approach in programming and transition to the technology of representation in the form of properties.
Creation of global systems of semantic access to data.
Competencies in the field of social and institutional engineering are beginning to bring a new understanding of approaches to the development of information technology and computer design.
Combining efforts in these areas provides a new impetus to the development of technologies that ensure the harmonization of social relations and cooperation as the most promising way of social management.
The author of the article represents the responsibility and social consequences of the dissemination of this information and the creation of systems that integrate the knowledge of mankind.


By creating models and approaches, we formalize the subject area into our own representation suitable for machining. Today we use:
1. An object–oriented approach in programming where abstraction, encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism are key concepts.
Abstraction – contextual understanding of the subject, formalized in the form of a class.Encapsulation means that a group of related properties, methods, and other members is treated as a single element or object.Inheritance describes the ability to create new classes based on existing classes.
Polymorphism means that you can have multiple interchangeable classes, even if each class implements the same properties or methods in different ways.
2. Markup, for data structuring and presentation, with support for multimedia technologies, human readable code, amenable to parsing.
3. Different types of databases, where records are associated with objects and fields with properties of these objects.
In fact, when we define an object that has a set of properties, we give it a synthetic property by calling it an object and giving it a specific name.
Referring to an object to a class, we already believe in our own imagination, perceiving it as something undeniable, accepting that the set of properties that we called an object, new, previously unknown properties, we will never know — for the case when we model reality (point 3), or for the case of programming – new properties we do not need, which can lead to a complete change in the program code, if this happens (point 1) and your database management system does not support the addition of object properties.
But even if the language tools allow you to change the properties of an object, you will still not be able to treat objects as properties, although, regardless of the present work, the understanding of the need for such actions comes to the software developers.
In data markup or structuring, we are faced with the ambiguity of the possible representation and forced binding to the created model with objects whose properties are fixed.
The markup language is not so “human” because it is not so much the words that one has to read as the markup symbols to understand how this markup will be perceived.
But it should be noted that the markup language – perhaps the only thing you can read. Reading a structure in a markup language can create the illusion of understanding, because it contains elements of the representation in the form of readable text and words.
These disadvantages of the markup language are the result of object–oriented representation, which is based on objects, not their properties, which entails fixing the semantic level of markup at the semantic level of created objects.
At the same time, any aggregation and creation of new concepts is faced with difficulties of execution, since machine codes represent objects (point 2).
Paradoxically, at the level of mathematical modeling and computer engineering, we are faced with the problems of cognitive distortions in the presentation of information.
We face technological problems created by ourselves, by our own inadequacy.
When we imagine objects and relationships between them, we are dealing only with properties.
And as soon as we do not rely on associations, and the effects of receiving them, we put imagination to the rank of the original simulation data.
The model becomes wrong initially, more precisely, “limited by your particular imagination”, which is suitable for testing hypotheses, but not for use in the knowledge environment.


Technology of information representation through properties — this is a model consisting of one element — “Property”.
Properties are considered as the subject of associations and are linked through the capabilities of the handler. Knowledge does not exist outside the human head, as information does not exist in isolation from the carrier.
In the machine representation is the basic part of the machine code, in the technology of presenting information through the properties of elementary part of the machine code for this property — a sensible piece of code, with links to property that provides the stream to a form that people can understand (machine code multimedia presentation).
Presentation of information in the form of properties enables rational presentation.
Presentation of information in the form of properties enables correct consistent presentation of information at any level of aggregation with the possibility of further detail and aggregation, without the need to adjust existing data.
The process of designing an analysis is to create new properties, and define binary relationships with existing ones.
Binary communication is considered in the form of — “ what with what and by what», — “a parent property is associated with a child property through a binding property.” Each property can act in one of the three mentioned roles in a binary relationship.
The technology of information representation through properties enables the application of criteria of adequacy of representation in the form of all the same properties.
It is quite clear what content exists — such knowledge, such opportunities. The question is that today we are faced with a conflict of engineering and information solutions formed many years ago, which need to be reviewed today. And we must try to revise these conflicts in such a way that in the future we do not repeat the same mistakes that are already evident today.
The presentation of the information imposes on the prospective of the computing system limits not less than “agreement” tire in existing systems.
Each operating system is a new language and approach to programming. The creation of intelligent resources in reality leads to the need to create new, non–relational databases and systems to manage them. The development of computer technology is suffocated by the contradiction of reality with the adopted technological agreements, on the one hand, giving the possibility of mass development of the industry, on the other hand, seriously limiting engineers in the application of effective technical solutions. All this requires new approaches to solving traditional problems.
The process of improving the presentation of data, search methods, contextual and semantic analysis began long before the advent of digital computers and does not stop until now.
Present the data in the record structure, along with organizing, creating unique properties of the arrays. Constraints on fields and records limit the ability to accommodate heterogeneous data with poorly controlled dimensions and structures.
We have learned to find information in memory and on media, using pointers and marking media. However, we can clearly see how modern computer technology is inferior to biological systems in improving the concepts used in intelligent activity.
In the real world, we are dealing with poorly structured processes and conventionally aware data.
However, the human brain copes with the issues of its own information service, and existing computer systems require human participation in the improvement of software codes and data sets.
My analytical experience of my own engineering, design, economic activities, as well as experience related to social and institutional engineering suggests that the problem of limiting the use of information is the principles of presentation of information and the adequacy of its description.


The continuous process of cognition is an integral part of everyone’s life, and it does not matter what a person is “looking for”, the way of life, a chair to network at the dining table, food to have lunch or an electric switch to use the properties of the interaction of electrons with antimatter, in the form of its antiparticles — positrons to create an electric current and illuminate the home. All this applies to thought processes, different in scale of significance and consequences, but the same mechanisms.
The whole process of learning consists in obtaining associations, the first of which are created by the child in the womb and the mechanism for obtaining which we use all our lives.
Initially, the associations are not the result of the comparison with the benchmark, and the comparison between them, which turns the standard.
Man, as a biological organism first learns to build associations on the basis of receptor and symptomatic sensation, then adds to it the results of chronological analysis, then adds to the use in the construction of associations hypotheses and assumptions created by all the same principles.
Chronological analysis creates an Association when we begin to understand, for example, the process of cyclical change of seasons, just as if we were able to touch it.
Hypotheses and assumptions create associations that we use as if we were able to feel something that we have never touched.
Experience also creates an Association, which we use, applying our knowledge with confidence in obtaining a result that as if we know in advance, as if we have already felt the result in the future with our own hands.
Mental activity creates associations from everything that is available, and does it constantly. This is a separate question – what is mental activity, and what is reasonable activity.
Let’s return to associations.
It is mental activity that creates associations, although in the everyday sense it is believed that we use the senses directly.
Human physiological activity is considered to be studied as a reflex. However, reflexes are formed not without the participation of the same abilities of the body as mental activity. Situational, even reflex behavior of a person is rather based on stereotypes formed by associations and fixed by experience.
But from the point of view of the behavioral features we observed:
externally independent from the mental process of the body and internal organs;
emotional (reflex) behavior of the body itself–with rapid situational assessment;
deliberate decisions, with a conscious assessment of the current situation and ways of its development.
Despite the participation of associations in the formation of behavioral functions, depending on the required speed, the reaction of the body does not always evaluate the compliance of the event pattern – created stereotype.
In the regulation of the body’s associations are fixed reactions of the body, providing vital biochemical processes.
The intervention of a reasonable component in the biochemical processes of the body itself still requires study.
In ensuring the coordination of movement conditional use of previously formed associative actions and obtaining new conditional associations is justified in connection with the stability of the conditions of performing motor functions.
In the creative and social sphere, the use of associations is reduced to obtaining each time a new current Association, which is a sign of reasonable behavior.
Sum up:
Associativity of the body, of course, open to question, but the impact of what we think the health of the body, does not cause serious doubts. Another thing, the depth of these ties. Of course, alcoholism, as a consequence of cognitive distortion or corruption of a person has a clear effect on the state of internal organs. The influence of cognitive distortions, which are not connected with the practical activity of a person, on his organism rather requires studying.
Emotional (reflex) part of the behavior makes a person nimble and allows you to effectively control your body, but its manifestation in the social sphere and in scientific research has no prospects of obtaining results.
Conscious behavior in reality, we call the reaction caused by the immediately preceding action of the thought process, which gave an assessment of the consequences and associated with the action of known processes.
In everyday life and little formalized literature, we are faced with tautology, often using in the same sense of Association, stereotypes and even reflexes. At the initial stage of the study, it is necessary to use contradictory vocabulary to bring understanding to the existing processes, to explain their nature.
How do we know something’s going on? We buy currency because we read about the change in the exchange rate on the Internet, and this is justified, unless of course we were not misled, and we correctly understood the information, and all this was done despite the fact that your wallet and exchange, in principle cannot be a neural connection. We are told about objects and relations, we study axioms and theorems, but we only have to guess about the existence of real processes. You do not know much about what is in your stomach, you can talk about the life of whales and the movement of stars, and not to no avail.
People think of the “properties” they manage to define, they give them names and associate them with other “properties”, imagining objects and the connections between them in the form of relations with quantitative characteristics and mathematical dependencies.
But from what you called something object (relation), it does not mean that it is really an object (relation) and this object (relation). In fact, you have focused your attention on a set of properties, and what you have called it somehow does not exist as a separate unit without a name, it may not be the same name that is given to the same properties by another person.
At first glance, it is a tautology, but as soon as we shift the properties to the structure of information representation, everything falls into place.
“Property” we actually use as a semantic unit of information for further construction of logical conclusions and meaningful structures that model reality.
The use of the term “properties” as a result of an Association rather than a “stereotype” or “conceptual point” is conditioned by the meaning bringing the understanding closer to computer modeling.
The term “property” most fully satisfies the meaning of the term in the simulated process and already has the desired meaning in programming.
Object programming provides for the presence of objects that have a certain set of properties. This model is adopted for writing code, thanks to the existing presentation of information as an elementary model of description, consisting of objects and relations between them.
Properties in this model is the relation of object to other objects, to logical, conceptual and physical possibilities of computing complexes. Cognitive distortion in the object–oriented model is the very concept of the object. An object with all attributes is allocated to a separate class, although it is actually only a synthetic aggregate property.
The proposed concept, developed for the natural science knowledge base on the technology of presenting information through properties, information structuring offers to carry out on the same principles and categories as in the representation of a person, which allows for clear processing and analysis. This is a conservative cardinal approach.
Natural science knowledge base should consist of one type of “quanta” of information, called “Property”. “”Property” is represented by one field of one variable–length record containing executable code.
We will have to move away from the unsuccessful attempts to use information structures that we ourselves have devised for a specific framework by jumping through a logical link in the presentation of information.
We begin to use objects in computer science, limiting their own capabilities as a mathematician, who replaced the concept of a model of space in Euclidean geometry axioms. For knowledge there can be no restrictions other than those that are the knowledge itself, so they must be in the database itself, and not in the means of its maintenance.


Information units are called “properties” and are stored each in some place. It would seem that nothing new, very similar to piled in the “strange folder” information is not very accurate user, and what’s the difference how to call them? Why not call it” Properties”, doesn’t it matter?
Today we are witnessing the attempts of private systematization of information of the individual data fragments without a common conceptual view of the data. At the dawn of the computer era, it actually started with the most important folder on each computer developer, usually called “garbage”, which led to the evolution of information technology to Hyper–garbage on every computer screen of the global network and disorientation in the minds of users.
But despite the fatality of the General situation and the scale of unsolved problems, manufacturers of both hardware and content direct their efforts to the adequate ordering of user properties and representations of information.
And this is what supports modern industries related to information technology in a suitable state for practical use. Even when hiring staff in high–tech companies, the main subject of testing is the adequacy of the applicant in relation to the perception and use of information, and only then tested professional skills in working with products.
We do not like not unique information, but users are mired in plagiarism and self–promotion. Stolen materials are issued for their own works, turning everything free into paid, other people’s successful materials – in their own, a huge number of insufficiently educated people invent long–invented things.
Today we think not with bits and bytes, as the first developers, but with terms close to everyday human understanding. And we want to get closer to understanding data so that there is no need to learn special programming to solve practical problems of data collection, search and evaluation.
We have become accustomed to the fact that the information is stored in portions, and we always solve the problem of access to it.
To access any portion of the information you need to know its location. To bind to a reality, you need to know the author. For the understanding of chronology requires the time of creation. To understand the logical origin, you need to know the location of the properties of the older and younger parent of this property. To use the property itself — you need to perform its content.
Thus, we have a portion of information storage with five semantic elements of navigation. This is the basis of the semantic meaning of the technology of information representation through properties.
Location index–an index that allows you to find the information unit.
There are various ways of technical implementation of the principles of classification of storage and use of data structure in the concept of “Natural science knowledge base” Anatoly Kohan.
In the process of searching for representation opportunities for the “ Natural science knowledge base», providing not only storage, but also joint work in the self–controlled information space the most promising direction of presentation is the technology of information representation through properties.
For the narrow task of experimental use, redundant implementations of the technology using existing databases are quite suitable. However, the concept of technology of information representation through properties as a whole has the ability to implement hardware — independent solutions and can have a low–level implementation.
The location index can be implemented as a local pointer to the position in a single file, and as a composite global location index that allows you to use the computing network as a single information array and as a unique reference to the cloud resource.
Today, the system of addressing information is sufficiently developed and can be used to a certain extent in solving the problem of finding the location, however, when using the technology of presenting information through the properties of addressing it makes sense different from moving the pointer, indicating the location of the semantic element of data representation.
This is no longer a link to information, it is a way to identify it. “That’s what’s laying there. “And nothing else can lie there, because it is” something “ — signed by this person property, for the content of which he is responsible in the system of assessment of personal adequacy, with all social consequences.
“Write everything, so the stupidity of everyone was visible”. Of course, this system is not for collecting nonsense and stupidity. This presentation of information allows everyone to formalize what has not been formalized before, and the rest to benefit from this achievement as a result of intellectual work.


Authorship in the modern world is not a privilege, but a responsibility. The field of knowledge is the most important area in the modern world. Knowledge forms responsibility and professionalism. Human knowledge is the value of a particular person for others.
The obvious cognitive distortions used to shape consciousness have the most severe personal, social and technological consequences.
An honest man defends his delusions, so do not rush to write down everything that came to mind. Think first. It is prestigious to become an author as much as it is responsible. Tomorrow your “light revelations” in understanding the world can become a line of medical diagnosis, or a direction to correct gaps in knowledge of natural Sciences.
In today’s world, their own skills have to prove every action.
The physical meaning of the “index” of responsibility as a pointer to the location of information about the author, implements the location Index. The actual implementation can have quite different implementations: from a simple pointer to a blockchain and an electronic digital signature, which is determined by additional properties containing the corresponding codes.


The time index can have its own independent value and can exist independently, but can be technologically combined with the location index or the content of the property itself.
The time index certainly has a territorial reference in the scale of the planet, and interplanetary space, can use the system of a single time. When separating data storage locations over long distances, when the time of information transfer begins to matter, it is necessary to take into account the effect of the “picture of the past” that occurs when observing stars, which despite the apparent existence in the sky can in reality have a different state from the visible observer. Time and location, like other semantic pointers, are associated with the unit of information itself and always refer to the location index.


This is the index of the pair. There are always two parent properties. And the sequence of elements in this pair of properties is important. The resulting property for one pair of parent properties may differ significantly from the first property in the pair.
Perhaps in layouts, some of the properties that make up the parent pair may not be known at the time of the initial filling.
So, the properties associated with the personalization of the author, the properties that are the product of observation of physically existing natural phenomena and elements of the real world, can have an independent, initially unformalized value, which can be incomplete pairs. However, the technology for presenting information via properties allows lossless correctly fill in missing elements of the submission, if necessary.
The physical aspect of this pair of properties is the primary and secondary property. The location properties model for a pair of herring and sea properties can have different meanings depending on the position of the parent properties in the pair, or herring in the sea or sea in the herring.
The example uses properties that are considered to be objects, but which are still properties, because both “herring” and “sea” as a subject of understanding consist of properties, based on which we make a classification–a new set of properties, simplistically calling it objects, although these are complex properties.
The index pair of the parent properties is a Boolean value that can be achieved in two location requests to the parent properties. This circumstance combines the work of the system with the same location index.
The assumption of using relational–like structures for semantic use of the index of location and position in space and time.
This section conceptually repeats the content of the previous ones and contains not a conceptual solution, but one of the possible technological implementations.
The element of executable code, called properties for effective use in the concept of adequate representation of information, is accompanied by search attributes, described in the conceptual model as “semantic link”. This semantic relationship can be described using a relational–like structure consisting of records containing five fields. In General, fields have variable length.

Universal field table:
The assumption of using a relational–like structure for semantic use of the index of location and position in space and time is applicable for models of knowledge bases and applied bases illustrating the technology of using properties for structuring information.
The technology of presenting information through properties has a wider perspective. It enables end–to–end structuring of information arrays not connected by communications. Online use of technology for the provision of information through the properties has good prospects of licensing, distribution, access and storage areas.


In fact, both in our own understanding and in practice, we use properties on the basis of which we define other structures, call them objects, which in fact we use as properties to determine other structures, which we also somehow call, but no matter how we try to present them, in practice we still have to use them as properties.
No matter how we classify arrays and algorithms, in fact we have only properties, and the content of this property we have to transfer control.
All this again sounds like a tautology, but the purpose of this reasoning is not so much to determine the content as to create a vessel for its storage and use of this vessel for its intended purpose, excluding contradictions of representation and allowing the existence of a set of unambiguous classifications.
The content of the” property “must be fully understood by the handler, so the” property “ always contains executable code, no matter what simple information operation is performed.
The technology of presenting information through properties is a kind of vessel that has yet to be filled with content.
The idea of presenting information through properties is to place in it not only what is now called data, but also executable code. Moreover, it is also advisable to place the data in a form that allows you to transfer control to them.
Thus, the location of the part of the knowledge base built on the technology of properties to which the request for execution is transferred, can become not the place of storage, but the place of execution of the request.
Let’s say we want to use WEB technology. To access the WEB, you will have to access the property in the property database, where the initial data of the WEB page (web entry point) is stored, associated with other properties of the visual representation of the data, which will be extracted by queries contained in them and selected by the user.
Thus, the base can place all the sites, except the receiving sites and end–to–end database to handle their content. In addition, users will be able to use partner information, and search engines – the ability to analyze the meaning of the pages.


If you want to access the database in a different way, use a different entry point that is adapted for the software you are using.
Specific properties can upload codes to the remote computer, which will change the licensing policy to the policy of granting access to individual elements of the property base. Thus, code execution becomes possible both in the cloud and on–premises.
With regard to presentation formats, the database contains both information and codes that allow it to be presented in a user–friendly manner.
Prospects for the evolution of computer technology arising from the use of the format of knowledge representation in the form of properties
Improvement of the internal architecture of computing equipment tends to transition from the tire interaction to the information.
The transition to internal high–speed communication has significant prospects in expanding the capabilities of computer technology. It is enough to determine the Protocol of interaction and the types of communication modems allowed to use.
Manufacturing technologies of external and interface devices have acquired a new quality. Today it is not just a specialized device, a separate computing device with its own processor.
The traditional processor itself is capable of being self–contained, and the motherboard can be converted into a communication interface distribution device. This architecture allows you to get rid of the tire interaction formats and switch to the communication interface.
The use of the communication interface in combination with the presentation of data in the form of properties allows you to move from the tire not just to the Protocol interaction, but to the semantic internal interaction. This is a new level of possibilities for the development and use of computer components and computers themselves.


By itself, the storage, recording and reading of information at certain addresses in memory and on external media in one way or another is used in all computing devices.
The technology of presenting information through properties differs in that each elementary unit of data storage is accompanied by service information that provides its semantic classification:
Location (address) of the author property
Address of the main parent properties
Address slave parent properties
Address properties of the space–time position
The address of the native location of the elementary storage unit is considered to be known.
Thus, any property is personalized, bound in space and time, and has an unambiguous value in the unidirectional binary relationship of the master and the subordinate parent property, and can act repeatedly as the master or subordinate parent property in the associated unidirectional binary links.

The difference between the semantic content of the information storage unit in the technology of information representation through properties
Information is considered initially as executable, and it should be noted that in the presentation of information through properties, each information is executable, even if the meaning of execution is enclosed in waiting (NOP).
In computer engineering, it is common to distinguish data from executable codes, but this is more about the safety and integrity of the computing device itself.
Directly executable codes are usually written by the manufacturer, the codes of the upper levels, due to the presence of low–level codes, are aggregated and use the low–level driver code to achieve the desired result.
Data in the classical information approach are considered as processed, in contrast to programs that are considered executable. However, in a model of presenting information through properties, these are no more than different levels of generalization.
In the technology of presenting information through properties, the data is presented at an arbitrary level of aggregation, so they do not use individual description constraints and are stored in structures that are convenient for execution: it can be links to files, markup of documents, and directly executable code.
Unlike the index in the technology of presenting information through properties
Indexing in the technology of presenting information through properties may differ significantly from the standard index construction.
Indexing in modern information systems is reduced to sorting links to the place of information storage by properties related to the context content of the information itself.
The search index in the technology of information representation through properties has no context dependence, therefore, cannot be built on the content of the data itself.
The index in the technology of information representation through properties has independent semantic value and consists of direct links to the location of information elements or related links. Thus, when executing a search operation eliminates the necessity of the execution of operations too much. In fact, the search is reduced to the address transition.

Harmonization of data and electronic means of their processing and presentation in the technology of information representation through properties We are used to losing media and unsupported format, we lose information along with media and outdated software.
The technology of presenting information through properties allow you to use the information itself to access various computing resources and technologies.
To access information by various means of presentation in the technology of information representation through properties it is enough to use different entry points with the description of communication products.
This gives the opportunity to translate the sites of the global network on end–to–end unified database, unified information systems.
This will reduce the share of information garbage, bind data to the place of their generation, transfer the protection of information to the distribution of access rights, get rid of duplication of information in different databases.
The technology of information representation through properties allows to separate information from means of access by combining the data and means of working with them.
Each new access tool has the ability to work with existing data, which does not threaten that they will not be displayed (not read), because the data are separated with the means of their submission, access receives a new “point of entry” with a description of their own work with the available data.


We always face the length of sequences needed to provide access to the data: reservation of fields, formats and accuracy of date and time, ending IP address fields, allowable number of nested items in a folder, technology of distribution and duplication of information in order to confirm its origin.
All these problems are solved by the transition to information technology with a comprehensive information description, relevant at the time of use. We cannot predict the problems arising from the use of fantasies, nor can we fully describe reality.
However, the correct description, adequate to knowledge and achievements, allows to bring order not only in the head of the person, but also in the software, and in the data used by computers.
The use of continuity properties in the work of links requires editing only when the data itself is migrated to a new storage location. For example, sampling for local use or updating media.
The absence of the need for normalization and the use of variable–length addresses removes formal hardware and Protocol limitations.
We can have a comprehensive information description, relevant at the time of using the technology of information representation through properties, due to the possibility of non–destructive additions.
In the technology of presenting information through properties, there can be no unreliable information, since each record has the meaning of the author’s description, but this technology, like human consciousness, does not exclude the possibility of fantastic interpretation.
However, such an interpretation will always take place of the origin and the author, the adequacy of which can be subjected to control and further analysis.
In any case, there will always be plenty to choose from and whose opinion to rely on.
Despite the independent importance of the technology of information representation through the properties, and the ability of technology to maintain up–to–date information content at the level of social adequacy, the semantic representation itself needs a modern era of understanding of science and natural science approach in obtaining associations.
From the current level of development of technology should be — “ Science–a set of human ideas that do not contain deliberate distortion.”
The modern level of technology development determines the natural science approach to obtaining associations.
“The natural science approach to obtaining associations consists in accepting for experimental confirmation only those fantasies that have a direct confirmation by the available observations, but only in the absence of observations that contradict the possibility of the existence of this fantasy in reality».
Natural science approach is implemented at the level of information presentation and is controlled by the rules of presentation and structuring of information available to the user.
Therefore, the technology of presenting information through properties, having the ability to document the continuity and non–destructive development of the information space, preserves and personalizes not only the adequacy, but also the stupidity and shortcomings of education, which become dead–end branches.
Prospects of development of the technology of presenting information through the properties is much broader than the problems solved in the initiative project by research Company Open World of «natural–scientific knowledge base», and would provide new quality in those projects, which will be used.

Аnatoly Kokhan