People may think that the whole thing in the human body. But people do not have enough skills to live independently at birth. The acquisition of skills necessary for a person to continue a full life takes place after birth. This allows a person to better adapt to changing environmental conditions. The extended possibility of adaptation is determined by the possibility of non-genetic information formation of behavioral functions (self-education of the body in the formation of vital physiological functions and the acquisition of social communications).
Another thing is that elementary recognition, as the creation and use of a mathematical algorithm, occurs "unconsciously", in the sense that a person does not understand how this happens. The man unconsciously creates and uses complex mathematical algorithms and has difficulty consciously using elementary mathematical actions.
The subject of awareness is the formalization of the content of social communications, while self-learning of physiological systems of the body remains beyond formalization and is perceived as "unconscious", despite the absolute associative correctness. Errors in the formalization of the content of social communications are acquired cognitive distortions and the backlog of social development from self-study of physiological systems is protected by the conceptual barrier of "awareness", which does not give the possibility of destruction of physiological systems by cognitive errors.
I will allow myself to doubt the correctness of ideas about the exclusiveness of the influence of hereditary mechanisms on the practical result of reasonable human activity assuming that the correctness of the formation of consciousness is the determining factor of personal social achievements. After all, the feeling of "unconsciousness" can be a consequence of the use of acquired cognitive distortions. In the same way as our ancestors, we can formulate a hypothesis and prove its validity or failure with the help of formal science, and then check the correctness of the knowledge obtained by the creation and study of descriptions of natural processes and, of course, use the planned experiment.
Can be discussed:
- Only what is confirmed by all the life experience of a particular person can be used in practice.
- To use all the evidence to date experience to solve current problems - not an exaggeration? Why so much effort, you ask?
- Then use your hypothesis (the decision, based on your current opinion) confirmed all existing, though insignificant by galactic standards, experience, and had at least some chances for a successful (appropriate expectations) results.
For many people, my message about the insignificance of the impact of heredity on the practical results of reasonable activity is clear, but more intuitive, because although it has practical evidence, but has no clear scientific explanation.
For example, the American scientist James Watson, awarded the Nobel prize for the discovery of DNA, deprived of all honorary titles because of his scandalous statements about the relationship between race and intelligence.
According to "Bi-bi-si", the famous biologist on TV again raised the question that the alleged genes affect the difference between the average IQ of representatives of the European and Negroid races. In the laboratory at cold spring Harbor, the Director of which Watson was previously called his words unsubstantiated and rash.
90-year-old scientist and previously put forward such assumptions. In particular, in 2007, he said that the future of Africa seems rather sad to him, because "all our social policy is based on the assumption that their intelligence corresponds to ours. Tests show that this is not so."
The fact is that human abilities, determined by tests, and even confirmed by the results of practical creative activity, do not give correct results worthy of trust. In practice, we see situations where the best practical results are achieved by people who do not have outstanding test results. Cognitive results of creativity differ in that yesterday - they are not, and tomorrow - is, and Vice versa. The result of intellectual activity depends more on the correctness of thinking and the absence of specific cognitive distortions. The social function of the brain is negligible compared to the resources of the same brain involved in the physiological functioning of the organism and its sense organs. These circumstances do not allow social underestimation of cognitive abilities of each person and the binding of intellectual abilities to national or physiological characteristics. Cognitive achievements are determined only by the authorship of a particular person.
Reality vectorNo matter how banal it may be, we live in a three-dimensional space with a filling in the process of movement, where nothing happens without a reason and nothing disappears anywhere. If something has disappeared, it has disappeared from your field of vision, beyond the area directly controlled by the senses, and if possible and willing, you will return to observing the effects of the processes you have previously observed. The law of conservation of energy and the material world testifies to the completeness of our perception, as well as the fact that the phenomenon of annihilation occurs exclusively in observations, when we do not know the object of observation and we do not have a complete idea of what we observe, the object or process.
Space in science is modeled by a coordinate system and is defined as the location of physical objects of living and inanimate nature, which are physically filling this space and occupy at a particular moment a particular area of this space.
The representation of social interaction in social space is similar in the observed structures to our ideas about the physical structure of the elementary construction of the physical space - atomic structures.
Despite its sameness - the unity of the laws of existence of the material world, extended to the intangible sphere, since an intangible asset not can exist without a material carrier, reality has its implementation in each elementary, from the point of view of consideration, the area of physical space for each phase of its change.
To predict the results of our own activities, we use modeling, for which we use assumptions that allow us to consider real processes in the form of geometric, algebraic or algorithmic representation. These assumptions limit the application of the mathematical apparatus and are called the domain of definition. We always plan our own activity in relation to the area in space, this area in this material is designated as a physical area of application.
In this context, the physical laws are considered, and the "sameness" of the laws of nature should be understood as the same action of a particular law of nature, regardless of the location of the spatial location of the physical area in which it is applied, provided that the area of definition of the law of the formal model of reality to which it is applied.
Under the "unity" of laws should be understood the relationship of physical laws with different areas of definition, as well as the fact that the physical laws do not contradict each other, and complement each other. Namely, when modeling a particular situation in different ways with the correct application of physical laws, we get the same result, characterized only by the error caused by different assumptions in different models.
The extension of the laws of the material world to the non-material sphere is purely motivational (prototype) in nature and it makes sense that in the non-material sphere we observe only projections of the real world, no matter how they are distorted by fantasies and no matter what order these fantasies are. There is nothing in the nonmaterial sphere that does not have a real prototype, and in the nonmaterial sphere we do not create anything that does not have our own perception, even if it is fantastic.
The parallel development of the real environment in the field of perception of one person creates a multi-faceted picture of the predicted events, United by chronology: so the elementary vector of reality for each spatial area is to change the next "frame", where the "frame" is understood as the actual perception of the available space on the countdown. And the adequacy of the assessment of human behavioral functions can be represented as a "prediction error of the next frame." This is a fairly correct and convenient representation, since a similar representation is used for semantic analysis of video images as information arrays, and allows the use of already known algorithms.
Each person works to reduce the error of his own prediction. Errors of own prediction form human behavior, the implementation of which, depending on the scale of the error, can lead to success, accompanied by minor failures, and to situations that do not give the opportunity to provide the natural needs of their own body, or even incompatible with the preservation of their own vitality.
People are in a constant process of their own harmonization, harmonization of their own lives with the physical and social environment. This is an attempt to approximate the vector of own representations with the vector of reality acting for their own physical spatial and social position.
The human body is in harmony with the realities of its own existence:
1. We cope with adaptation to the physical world right from birth, thanks to the constancy of the laws of physics and chemistry.
2. Our body adapts to the biological environment of its habitat, adjusting its own functioning in the conditions of penetration of viruses, bacteria, fungi and microorganisms, regulating the operation of its own systems in the biological environment and penetration, forming and building up its own systems of biological harmonization.
3. We try to build social relations with our own kind.
However, when we begin to harmonize social relations, we face a problem that does not exist in the harmonization of physical and micro biological environments – we form THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT ourselves. This is not what we want, and so are physiologically.
In the social environment, it is possible the emergence of synthetic laws that contradict the laws of nature, with which it is necessary to fight no less rigidly than with parasites and with attacks on the integrity of your own body.
"What is confirmed by the life experience of a particular person can be used in practice, based on the considerations of obtaining the expected result from their actions." Let's try to determine the scale of social disasters and the truth of this statement.
In the case of turning on/off the light - you turn on the light switch in the room – the light is lit. It is enough to remember which position of the switch turns on and which turns off the light, and even if you do not remember how the switch works, it is enough to remember where it is.
All this is true if the light works. But imagine the situation that the light is not turned on. If a person not can turn on the light bulb, it is fatal. But really – changing a light bulb is considered as the user of premises and (or) the user of the lamp. It already required a level of competence.
But to change the bulb, you have to take this bulb somewhere. Of course, you can Unscrew the bulb in one place and install in another. But you not can do without those people who make light bulbs. And if the switch is broken, you not can do without a master.
But I wonder, "break" might and power plant, or an accident waiting to happen on power lines. Then you are hardly able to influence the recovery of light in your room, especially if the reason for failure was social (possibly armed) conflict or an emergency.
But you have other options of arrangement of the life. In the end, you can put yourself a solar panel, use a flashlight, matches, wait for the moon to come out or just try to get used to the darkness.
Thus, it is possible to make two intermediate output:
• the more competencies you have, the more opportunities to solve even elementary household problems,
• you have almost no opportunity to return the benefit of civilization in the absence of civilization itself, because you are not able to get materials and components directly from nature.
It turns out that according to the first point of the intermediate conclusion - the capabilities of a person are determined by his competencies.
Now let us consider how the capabilities of a person are determined by his competencies?
Human knowledge is a set of practical skills. A socially adequate person will not have a room without a correct understanding of its operation and maintenance. But while it is possible a situation when financial means (or their resource analog) has not quite socially adequate person who poorly imagines the issues of operation, waste management, organization of safety of economic activity or disoriented in their own desires.
A person may not have an adequate understanding of their own competencies. First of all, lack of competence in solving even domestic issues will lead to additional costs and changes in the quality of the material object. For example, an elementary installation of a light element (even a light bulb) of another heat release will not only reduce the life of the lamp, but also can cause ignition of both the elements of the lamp and the electronic light control units. The same can be said about almost every inadequate action.
Trying to contact a specialist to solve the problem of a disoriented person is also socially dangerous. Disoriented people use their own concept, far from modern reality and do not have the ability to determine how much they need a particular specialist, and how to determine the qualification of a person – the qualification of those works that need to be produced. A separate danger is represented by "customers" who have imaginary skills, which force the contractor to do work not on technology and common sense, but in accordance with their own concepts, distorted by insufficient knowledge.
A good example is construction in the private sector of the Russian Federation. Due to the impossibility of introducing technical control, the construction of almost all private housing is carried out by people who are not properly trained and have an idea about the construction – "how not to do". Such people have cognitive distortions related to professional construction activities, which makes it impossible to get a full-fledged real estate object as a result of construction, which does not need rework and constant repair. As a result, the cost of work and the cost of materials is much higher than the cost of finished objects, and the construction objects themselves do not stand up to any criticism and, of course, not can even be insured by a fair insurance contract.
Thus, no matter how we approach the convenience of using technology to people with everyday understanding, there is a need to update the level of social knowledge to the appropriate modern technologies. We are not even talking about the General build-up of practical skills, we are talking about their update: something is no longer relevant and not necessary, but something today you need to know exactly to do without a guardian.
The relevance of social knowledge requires an ongoing update. People with an active life position update their own social knowledge to the current state themselves, which not can be said about the conservative part of the population, unprepared to abandon the already acquired cognitive distortions, which in the process of updating social knowledge only increase their own misconceptions.
It turns out that the experience, accompanied by excessive costs, spoiled lamp and spontaneous combustion of electronics, which occurred as if by accident (although it is absolutely natural), and explained by the poor quality of goods, components or stupidity of uncomplicated developers of lamps and electronics, in the opinion of the subject can be positive, but the total set of circumstances – clearly negative.
Back to the question - "What is confirmed by the life experience of a particular person can be used in practice, based on the considerations of obtaining the expected result from their actions." Yes or no?
The answer seems to be-Yes, but exactly as long as we are talking about adequate human behavior. The man in the street can turn the lights on and off. But as soon as we move beyond his competence to an area where his experience is ephemeral, the answer immediately changes to the opposite. And we say – no, his experience is dangerous for his life and the lives of others, the layman requires care.
We evaluate our own actions. What is the reason for the wrong self-assessment? It is clear that the reason is own cognitive distortions. But how to get rid of cognitive distortion? Not every self-assessment will be incorrect. Who writes these rules?
Here already went clear cognitive distortions directly in the statement of the question. In this context, the word "right" makes sense – "adequate". But when we say "adequate," we have to understand "adequate to what"? And we are always talking about one thing – "adequate to your own perception", not a fantasy about your own perception. Oh, I looked at this sunset – it's like a “war of Worlds!" Of course, this is a “war of Worlds” and elements, this is my perception of the red sky! No, of course, it's your imagination, and you know it. Your perception is that you looked at this sunset and thought what you saw might be like a “war of Worlds."
People create obvious cognitive distortions themselves, know and create, posing as real events and circumstances. Of course, this comes from stupidity and lack of knowledge – from a lack of knowledge of the subject, and as a consequence - a lack of social knowledge, which is a responsibility. It is necessary to talk not just about cognitive distortions, but about intentional cognitive distortions, even if you acquire cognitive distortions yourself, and not as a result of corrupting you with lies during the period of emotional and intellectual maturation in childhood (although everyone more or less had to go through it).
Science (from the Latin word science, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that buildings and organized knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. Of course, "a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of verifiable explanations and predictions about the universe," the universe is not only the cosmos, it is we, and everything around us.
And we tend to repeat our own mistakes as a systematic enterprise, to build and organize our knowledge (as a set of practical skills, though contrary to common sense) in the form of verifiable (we also deliberately ignore their own perception) explanations and predictions. Naturally, we use repetition both in teaching and in associative perception. And it is absolutely obvious to us that the untrained people whose stupidity is in the stage of cunning fool the rest of the head.
The definition of science should be added - "not containing intentional distortions". I propose the following wording:
Science is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of verifiable explanations and predictions about the universe, free from intentional distortions.
Intentional distortions are not an incorrect application of a formal mathematical apparatus, which can be checked and challenged and which is ultimately amenable to computer control, it is first of all a correct presentation of data. It should be noted that the source of data is always the person and the data presented to them are always the source, even if you use the devices, nothing matters to the person until it gets into the brain of the person, at least at the present stage of technology development. Thus, it is really about the correct presentation of information.
Cognitive distortions of information representation and the method of its correct representation are described by me in the article "Technology of information representation through properties". I do not want to introduce into the definition of science the concept of "Technology of presenting information through properties", because the most important component of any work is the understanding of the author by readers, otherwise readers will not be able to use the proposed intangible asset. No matter how high the quality of an intangible asset is, the question of its correct application depends in the same way on the correct understanding of the person who gets acquainted with this intangible asset. In addition, we do not speak a formal programming language, and in everyday languages, and are forced to use categories that are not in the language yet, describing their public terms, trying to find understanding.
In short, the "Technology of presenting information through properties" is based on the fact that knowledge, as a set of skills, exist only in the "head" of a person as a subject of Autonomous functioning, and in this regard, all the data received by him and transmitted to someone not can be considered in isolation from the properties of his body and already received.
It seems very difficult, but an elementary introduction to the information arrays, exactly as in their own understanding of "personalization" gives an understanding of the origin of information, which in turn makes it possible to apply completely different principles of analysis. Personalization refers to the source of information for a particular recipient and the circumstances in which the information was received. In everyday language – "personalization" is: "who told you"; "when it happened"; and so on. In databases "personalization" provides the minimum required attributes of each record - "date with time" and "who made the record."
Despite the complexity of the formulation, the "Technology of information representation through properties" is easily available in application, although it essentially clarifies both the process of understanding and the processes of information representation. "Technology of information representation through properties" makes information arrays suitable for scientific processing, but does not exclude formal errors of each subject, but this part can be detected and corrected by automated processing, which is impossible today, based on the incorrectness of the object-oriented approach of information representation.
The incorrectness of the object-oriented approach in automated systems is that the "object" is always a product of cognitive activity – it is a representation or assumption. As a result, models based on the concept of "object", replace the data with pre-made conclusions. In fact, the "object" in the physical world is determined by a set of properties and is an integral property that allows to divide the carriers of signs into sets. Substitution of concepts allows cognitive distortions about reality to get into the codes of the programs themselves and make the databases contradictory.
Cognitive deformation of realityLet's say that a person has a broken consciousness. Consequently, in attempts at social rehabilitation, a person is forced to combine his own contradictory stereotypes into a single idea. Naturally, the Union of conflicting elements of one system of values that does not contradict each of the elements is possible, but this system immediately becomes dependent, it acquires problem-oriented properties. In other words, these are no longer uniform rules, but rules depending on the circumstances and the place of their application. The system of values acquires the property of a living organism, it adapts, constantly justifies its hapless owner.
Contradictory opinions of one person on different issues are United by a theory that has no relation to reality. To create the appearance of harmony from conflicting opinions can only fantasy, which would be more correct to call fiction (in medical terms it is called delirium) - a system of values that has no relation to reality. In fact, it is a form of delirium caused by persistent cognitive distortions, and physicians who do not suffer from social disorders themselves have an appropriate opinion. Brad (lat. dēlīrium) is often defined as a disorder of the content of thinking with the emergence of non-reality painful representations, reasoning and conclusions in which the patient is fully, firmly convinced, and that not can be corrected.
Situational contradictory assessment gives the impression of deforming reality. The situation of changing reality is naturally associated with the projection on interpersonal relations. Thus are born the idea about the other dimension, the demons, the "cunning" gods, aliens, higher mind.
Naturally, the results of human practice or acquire unpredictable results, or almost guaranteed to meet expectations. We see this clinical picture both in politics and in economies, especially in third world countries, and in the oligarchy, which has no social desires or social desires of exclusively "recreational" content, often bordering on manic.
Paranoid personality disorder (from others-Greek. παράνοια - madness) is a personality disorder characterized by excessive sensitivity to frustrations (mental state, arises in a situation of actual or perceived inability to meet those different needs, or, in other words, in a situation of discrepancy of desires capacities), suspicion, resentment, the constant dissatisfaction with others and a tendency to attribute all to your account. So, Included in ICD-10 and DSM-5.
If, in your opinion, "something is confirmed by your life experience", it does not mean that "something" can be followed. It is deliberately created by the deformation of reality.
Indeed, you are well aware that our world is made up of misconceptions. For example, you can constantly make mistakes and be convinced that you are right, and continue to make mistakes.
Thus, if your internal methods of obtaining knowledge allow cognitive distortions to penetrate into your consciousness, you are doomed to a contradictory picture of the world, which will lead to the creation of ephemeral values, the use of which is no more than an excuse for your failures to obtain the expected results from your actions.
In some ways, people are born explorers and each of us, whether we want to or not, is engaged in bringing their own understanding of the world around them to the existing reality.
The use of the communication social field and information space requires the development and application of their own (other does not happen) strategies for the correct presentation of information and not all successfully cope with this, especially in a situation where cognitive distortion is transmitted from the previous generation. This is a deeper physiological process that reconstructs the physiological systems of the body. This gives reason to assume: "people what they think, made of what they eat and what breathe, on principles - inherited from ancestors." About the diseases associated with the fact that people think is known for a long time, and today we have the opportunity to make people mentally healthy again and perhaps just forget about the existence of many physiological diseases.
The level of technological development determines the permissible level of cognitive distortion of a member of society
Cognitive distortions of a person create patterns of behavior and define actions in the same way as cognitive activity of a person. Like any actions - actions caused by cognitive distortions, lead to the result, another thing is that these results are not expected. But it should be noted that these results clearly correspond to the cognitive distortion that is the cause of such actions. "Like the best, but it turned out as always" is a formula of karma caused by cognitive distortion.
Cognitive distortions create "is not the expected person, but in fact he himself programmed the" trouble and depriving people of the opportunity to choose their future.
Cognitive biases embedded in social theories are no exception. People are wrong, but the lack of will, ignoring a reasonable approach to solving current problems, unwillingness to learn new competencies deprive a person of the opportunity to correct his mistakes. But for one person – it is a mistake and the fate of one person, and in a society where the actions of one person depends on the fate of other people – cognitive distortion have fatal consequences for the whole society.
The level of technological development determines the permissible level of cognitive distortion of a member of society. Social responsibility and social education go out to determine the viability of a society when using specific technologies.
Today we use the international distribution of labor, but we have forgotten about social responsibility, and the egopolar nature of social relations has launched destructive mechanisms of confrontation, which led, in particular, to instability in Russia and confrontation in local conflicts. It is necessary to correct the mistake and put into practice social education and social responsibility – a project of Social government in the concept of Anatoly Kohan.
The international distribution of labour, makes it possible for every country and company that produces meaningful consumer products and their components to participate in this process.
Cognitive distortions of social relations theory and practiceThe formula of communism: "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
It is not necessary to deny the fact of heredity, but man is not born at birth, man become. Knowledge of science provides an understanding of reality, an understanding of fantasy and responsibility in the application of technology. We know this now, but these "important details" were missed by the founders and practitioners of Communist ideas.
The vivid cognitive distortion of the primary slogan of communism could well be smoothed out by adequate state management and science. But in reality, the opposite happened. The reason for the failure of planted ideas and social experiments is that the placement of personnel has created an insurmountable barrier that separates management from reality and the current achievements of scientific thought. In short, the stupidity of these territories prevailed over science.
But the question is not what happened, but why did it happen? After all, the placement of personnel is not a random process. Unlike the social scheme operating under the democratic Constitution in the West, the Constitution of the USSR, no less democratic and outwardly more socially loyal to every citizen, concealed from us the real asocial scheme of social mechanisms. The fact is that the Declaration of human rights and freedoms, however good and beautiful it may be, is not sufficient to realize the freedoms and potential of human creative development.
Communist ideology ignored its polar nature of human relations. And if the "iron curtain" at that time private property played the role of the actual freedom of each person, the Communist principles of social construction only declared the freedom of the citizen, leaving him no choice of social behavior.
In the USSR, the Communist ideology did not allow lobbying the interests of a particular person at the state level, whatever they were, but allowed to mask private interests of the public Communist ideology. As a result, honest and adequate people were completely isolated from management. And what kind of science and sanity can we talk about?
In textbooks and scientific literature in the Russian field, I observe a very precise relation to the numerical values of the quantities within the problems and a very free attitude to the definitions. In my opinion, the Russian-speaking public, including the scientific, due to the Communist past, is more focused on its own importance – the very inflated authority that creates "creativity" in the field of increasing bureaucracy. In the English-language scientific information space, hypotheses and forecasts are of greater interest, a more scrupulous attitude to experimental evidence and the accuracy of conclusions contributes to the development of previously known knowledge and the creation of technologies based on reality.
However, both English-speaking and Russian-speaking linguistic audiences to some extent mix accurate data relating exclusively to the content of models with everyday understanding (more precisely, with everyday misunderstanding). To be even more precise - people mix science with everyday misunderstanding and obvious cognitive distortions.
On us dollars, as well as on the institutions of American justice, you will see the inscription: "In god we trust", this phrase should not be understood in a religious sense, it means - "We trust reality". Today, this formula does not cause me doubt if the reality is understood as the result of human interaction with the environment directly or through known tools. A minor phrase, the layman seems – it's about nothing. But it is the fundamental basis of knowledge. We have an idea of reality that is inherent in our own body and the measuring instruments we use.
All we get is the result of changing one relative to the other. We look at the picture and decide that it has not changed, based on the fact that time has changed.
Now let us turn to the measurement of time. Have you ever wondered why time in our perception is always a function with an argument that has a spatial unit of measure – a quantity that can be reduced to a linear quantity in a three-dimensional coordinate system (a quantity that can be converted into a function of the length of a linear segment in a three-dimensional coordinate system)?
How do we determine the time? For example, on its own symptomatic feel for my heartbeat, that is those or other biochemical processes in the body or even a mechanical pulsation of the brain blood system.
Electronic clock – we determine the counts by changing the visual content or sound of the alarm clock, which always means some physical impact within our own three-dimensional world.
Atomic clocks make it possible to check directly on the direct signal, the signal with a resonant frequency from the atomic clock is transmitted to the air. The frequency for the resonance of the cesium atom today is defined by international agreement and is 9 192 631 770 Hertz, so when dividing the output signal by this number should be 1 Hz, or 1 cycle per second. (Atomic clocks have improved the accuracy of time measurement by a million times compared to astronomical methods. To date, the most accurate atomic chronometer loses one second in five billion years). The frequency of 9 192 631 770 Hertz is forbidden for operation of radio-electronic devices all over the world, atomic clocks work on it.
It may seem to you that electromagnetic fields have nothing to do with mechanical motion, you are wrong, it is the change in the spatial position of the charges that creates an electromagnetic field that exactly corresponds to the parameters of motion.
In fact, even the time we measure in units of length, regardless of whether it is our body or an accurate device – roughly speaking in centimeters.
As soon as you begin to understand the meaning of what is said, you immediately understand the relativity of worldviews and cognitive distortions that abound in your consciousness.
Returning to cognitive distortions, in public relations cognitive distortions can be as insignificant, even if they succumb to every minute, and significant, even fatally destructive, and this despite the fact that the "formula containing cognitive distortion", a person will receive only once in a lifetime. The danger of cognitive distortions is determined by their content.
Stereotypes reflect our ideas about the surrounding reality and can have a factual, algebraic, geometric, logical and conceptual nature, but regardless of the form of our own awareness in formal science, it is always a formula. And in the formal representation of the stereotype contains parental signs of their own appearance and cognitive distortion involved in its formation. Every stereotype obtained in the correct way is adequate. The stereotype, in the formation of which there was a cognitive distortion is a "formula containing cognitive distortion".
And if in the use and creation of the technologies themselves cognitive distortions have destructive consequences associated with the direct content of the cognitive distortions themselves, then in the public field cognitive distortions, essential for technologies, acquire a dual form of division of people into two social groups – into two groups of destructive social influence. The socially important technologies of cognitive distortions are incompatible with the use of specific technologies and groups of technologies, or even technical development, create social groups, inappropriately using the technology itself. This does not mean that people are simply against some technology, people are just the opposite – for, but in the absence of social knowledge as a social responsibility, they begin to apply technology methods that destroy social structures and destroy people.
The division of groups of destructive social influence by significant cognitive distortions is determined by two possible strategies to go forward or to roll back. In practice these are strategies:
1. «Parrots». People, ceasing to understand what is happening, lose the opportunity to use the stereotypes valid yesterday because they do not lead to the expected results. But they keep repeating them like parrots because they have no alternative.
2. 2. «Rats». Understanding the futility of repeating the learned invalid "truths" and the lack of a working alternative social strategy makes active people turn their attention to the Orthodox, even if already invalid values, which, for example, today include: inadequate property needs; the desire for financial enrichment incommensurable with social desires; violence against other members of society; social parasitism and bureaucratic growth.
People who lack technical knowledge and the accompanying technical knowledge of social knowledge simply have not choice, they are already immersed in lies. The situation is aggravated by the fact that they had lived with this delusion in General before, but they simply did not know about it, because their cognitive distortions were insignificant yesterday, but with the advent of new technology, the world has changed so much that their current delusions and lack of knowledge have become dangerous for themselves and for others.
It should be noted that the mechanism for the return of the state of adequacy to the members of society also exists, but it does not exist as a social force, it exists as knowledge that must be distributed to the social environment in the same natural way as new knowledge is distributed in social environments - before technology is distributed. First thought and only then have made.
The proliferation of technology without its own participation creates a cult of "cargo", which is in fact forced or targeted parasitism. The gap and absence, or altered strategy is not the goal of active adequate human too does the parasite.
Social group "Parrots".People belonging to the social group with the behavior of "parrots" are forced to remember and say the "right" words, not understanding what they do to perform a particular social function irresponsibly, but sometimes quite effectively participating in the creation and use of technology. Social group "Rats". People belonging to the social group with the behavior of "rats", understand the presence of disorientation, but do not understand as disorientation with causes and consequences, and identify failures in public relations and see the possibility of using them for personal purposes. Why in personal, but because they do not see effective mechanisms of harmonization with public goals, to be more precise, they understand that the existing mechanisms of regulation in the public interest have begun to work inadequately, and there is nothing else. Orientation to achieve personal goals immediately becomes greed, mechanisms based on misinformation begin to work, there is personal inadequate competition, a field for emotional and physical influence, a distorted understanding of power, imposed services, ethical norms disappear and so on.
"Rats" are localized in the controlled territory, destroying their own kind and members of the social group "parrots", depriving them of access to the satisfaction of not only creative, but also natural, vital needs.
This situation occurs not only in areas under post-Communist influence, but in all areas where cognitive distortions are common, incompatible with the current level of technological development.
There may be many opinions, but the reality is one.
Each of us probably had to deal with situations where people have different opinions about the same phenomenon, process or event. Often, we do not pay attention to this, and it does not bring inconvenience to social relations, if the cognitive distortions of the parties do not conflict with the content of the technologies used, that is, they are beyond the vital social knowledge for society.
But everything changes when we start talking about tomorrow and the technologies of the future. People with different opinions enter into a dialogue aimed at finding adequate reality of technological solutions and strategies. At this point, the reality factor turns on. One single common reality unites our efforts to study it, and this is what happens when we are able to use our minds to communicate with each other. That's when we're physiologically and emotionally complete.
People will always find a common language, if not lie to each other (deliberately mislead each other). Moreover, having different, competitive opinions on the tactics of solving problems and being United by the ultimate goal, they will inevitably become like-minded.
In adequate social relations, neither war, nor meaningful social conflicts, nor the production of weapons, nor dirty technologies are possible. But adequate social relations require a system of adequacy control. Help from a psychiatric clinic is clearly not enough, and one psychiatric control not enough.
Must social education, the social organization of creativity, to technological developments, the collection and systematization of established open an intangible asset, control competencies and providing access to performance of social desires, which allow its competence.
Intangible asset creation and training system for the manufacturing sector, creating the necessary material benefits for the whole society is called by me "Social government". The concept of «Social government» in the version of Anatoly Kohan can be found on the websites www.kohan.ru, www.russia-school.comu and in the materials of the all-Russian newspaper "Modern school of Russia".